9th Planet

On the Earth Magnetic page of this site, I explained and manifested a different magnetic configuration to what most Scientists are claiming for planet Earth. While there is an induced south polarity magnetic field around the axis of rotation in the North Pole and South Pole, there exists a permanent magnet; the solid Inner Core, that is free to swivel, tilt or flip inside the molten Outer Core. The fact that the 2 permanent magnetic poles are shifting eastward tells of a strong magnetic pull by another magnet/ planet that is unknown to current planetary configuration. The unprecedented present speed of the magnetic pole shift from Canada towards Siberia at 4 times the speed in the last century foretells such an unknown planet into the solar system that was never confirmed to exist.

However, in February 2011, the scientific journal Icarus published a paper by astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire, who proposed the existence of a binary companion to our sun, larger than Jupiter, in the long-hypothesized “Oort cloud” — a faraway repository of small icy bodies at the edge of our solar system. The researchers use the name “Tyche”, which means “luck” in Greek, for the hypothetical planet. Their paper argues that evidence for the planet would have been recorded by NASA Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). But it hasn’t!

A new research that was published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters, is based on analysis of an effect called the “Kozai mechanism”, by which a large body disturbs the orbit of a smaller and more distant object. The research is being carried out by scientists at the University of Madrid and the University of Cambridge. They have been tracking large asteroids known as “extreme trans-Neptunion objects” (Etnos), which orbit the sun at least six billion kilometers away. Spanish lead scientist Professor Carlos de la Fuente Marcos, from the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), explained: “This excess of objects with unexpected orbital parameters makes us believe that some invisible forces are altering the distribution of the orbital elements of the Etnos, and we consider that the most probable explanation is that other unknown planets exist beyond”. The scientists have found the objects orbit the Sun in a manner consistent with them being subject to the gravitational pull of a planet at least as large as Earth.

In January 2016, Caltech researchers have found evidence of a giant planet tracing a bizarre, highly elongated orbit in the outer solar system.

Figure 103- 9th Plant Orbit - Caltech Jan 2016

The object, which the researchers have nicknamed Planet Nine, has a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbits about 20 times farther from the sun on average than does Neptune (which orbits the sun at an average distance of 2.8 billion miles). According to Caltech researchers, it would take this new planet between 10,000 and 20,000 years to make just one full orbit around the sun. Considering the geological evidences, historical discoveries and ancient text that I explained over this site and on my book that was released in 2009; the Exodus Mystery, Abraham Mystery Planet and the Great Deluge, that the orbital cycle of that planet is estimated at 3,562 years (Inner Solar to Kuiper Belt/ Oort Cloud and back) + 52 years (Inner Solar and round the Sun and back) i.e. a total of 3,614 years and that the due date on its next arrival at the Inner Solar System is August 2017. In some parts of my research I called it as the 12th planet (considering the dwarf planets known to us; Pluto, Eris and Makemake).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 9th Planet

  1. addn says:

    “The unprecedented current speed of the magnetic pole shift
    from Canada towards Siberia at 4 times the speed in the last century
    foretells such an unknown planet within the solar system
    that was never confirmed to exist.”
    — if a planet way out there could cause pole reversal;
    why isn’t such reversal happening all the time
    from the approaches of planets nearby?

    • T.Niazi says:

      Archaeomagnetic Dating on https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/archaeomagnetic-dating-guidelines/ illustrates the pole wandering over the last 3,000 years in the Arctic Circle. I attribute such moves to inner solar system planets as they orbit in different proximity levels to the Earth. While Mars and Venus have weak magnetic fields, Jupiter’s magnetic field is 20,000 fold the Earth’s magnetic field. Jupiter orbital period is 11.8 years. This means that over a period of 12 years, Earth comes closer to Jupiter some 11 times. The Magnetic Pole in the Arctic Circle has started its migration from Canada towards Siberia more than 160 years ago. Earth’s Magnetic Field has dropped by 5% in 120 years, followed by another drop of 5% in the following 30 years, followed by another 5% in the last decade. You may refer to https://planet-earth-2017.com/2014/08/15/the-true-drop-in-the-magnetic-field-strength/ on this site which links to https://planet-earth-2017.com/2014/06/23/current-magnetic-field-map-confirms-3-magnets-configuration/ that refers to the US National Geophysical Data Center and the Kyoto World Data Center for Geomagnetism to establish the drop in Earth magnetic field as well as the migration paths of its poles. I hope you agree that the acceleration in the collapse of the magnetic field and the migration paths over the last 160 are not attributed to Jupiter who has constant and annual influence on the Earth’s magnet and is considered to have the strongest planetary magnetic field of the inner solar system. Hence, the acceleration of Earth Magnetic Field collapse (mainly in the western and southern hemispheres) over the past 160 years and continuous migration eastward by the 2 magnetic poles must have come from a planet that falls outside the known ones.

      • addn says:

        I figured most of the change in earth’s magnetosphere
        happens for the same reason it does in the sun:
        simple instability of the process that creates the magnetosphere.

  2. It think that it may be too soon to make definitive statements on the magnetic forcing by other planets in the universe. We need to know much more about the cyclic nature of the galaxy, the solar systems, and earth which may be found in the work for Double Helix Nebula UCLA: Co-authors on the Nature paper are Keven Uchida, a former UCLA graduate student and former member of Cornell University’s Center for Radiophysics and Space Research; and Tuan Do, a UCLA astronomy graduate student. Morris and his UCLA colleagues study the galactic center at all wavelengths. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for the agency’s Science Mission Directorate. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology. JPL is a division of Caltech. NASA funded the research. Also, we should keep in mind that the study of magnetic forcing includes the relationship of the magnetic poles and the Sun now being. NASA is studying the magnetic flow between the Sun and earth, but not its relationship to climate forcing. I have identified the relationship between climate forcing and the geophysical poles and the location of the magnetic poles. Although generalized climate change predictions may be made from my analysis, more research is needed to provide valuable details. Earth’s present magnetic chaos is most likely caused by the relocation of the magnetic poles.

    • T.Niazi says:

      The model I designed for Earth is conceptual. Through assembly of basic but credible components of physics, geophysics, geology, astronomy and more, I was able to deduce a new magnetic configuration for our planet. Applying the Coriolis effect for instance, I was able to find out that the induced magnetic field due to Earth spin are of south polarity at both the Antarctic and Arctic regions, which suggests that there must be other and different source for a permanent magnet that has clear north and clear south magnetic poles. The explanation of the Plasmoids that emerged some 10,000 years ago in Antarctica is therefore introduced (induced south magnetic polarity patches side by side with a permanent north magnetic pole). It is therefore that Plasmoids are not an indication of magnetic pole reversal as some scientists predict! I researched the Thermosphere layer and proposed an empirical model for its thermal radiation and the formation of the Temperature Belts at the surface of Earth. The model predicts that the belts are centred around the magnetic poles. The movement of the magnetic poles would result in tilting of the Temperature Belts and therefore what I call Climate Exchange; where a region of Continental Belt climate could turn into Middle Latitude Belt climate and vice versa. Earth spin speed is also related. Not only that the location of the magnetic poles impact the Temperature Belts but also the Spin Speed. On Earth Spin Speed page of this site, I briefly explained how the Faraday “left hand rule” explains what makes Earth spin and how the movement of the magnetic poles could change the angle between the Outer Core electrons flow and the Inner Core magnetic field force lines, thus creating a Lorentz force on the perimeter of the Inner Mantle to drive the planet to spin. The change of the angle between the equatorial plane electronic current flow and the magnetic field force lines would change the Lorentz Force. Maximum speed would be attained when the angle makes 90 degrees. Earth spin became to a halt if the the angle is 0 degree. Earth spin could be reversed if the angle is a negative one! There also introduced geological evidences that could support my theory that Earth does not only have a dynamo at heart but also a motor thanks to its Inner Core permanent flux of magnetism and radioactive generation of electrons for 1 billion year to come. Again, much of the model is explained over various pages of this site. The pages are extracts of the book I published back in 2009. I agree with you that more depth is needed onto every branch; to fine tune the model and/ or challenge it. Researching into ancient text along with geological discoveries help me establish a cycle of repletion of Earth changes. A different spin speed at each cycle, climate exchange and geography reshaped due to sea level variation to say the least. I will try to connect with the names you kindly passed on and/ or learn from their research too. Thank you.

  3. Tonian says:

    The Electric Universe Theory (see You Tube) would negate the need for mysterious planets. Hypothetically these changes being witnessed today and in our yesterday’s would be the result of voltage changes, spikes in the sun’s magnetic field. That is to say that that the magnetic filaments feeding our sun and all planets fluctuates thereby causes changes in our solar sytem

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s