Earth Changes

6 Responses to Table of Contents

1. Paul Shaheen says:

   September 18, 2014 at 4:17 pm

   In this article summarizing findings presented at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24755-earths-poles-are-shifting-because-of-climate-change.html#.VBsEsxZGidm the pole shifts are postulated to have been caused by global warming itself rather that the supposed planet Nirabu. I would be interested in your comments. I would be interested in your comments

   Reply
2. planetearth2017 says:

   September 19, 2014 at 9:06 am

   Apparently there are 2 kinds of shifts. The magnetic pole shift and the geographic pole shift. The magnetic poles are not symmetrically distant from the geographic axis of rotation, and they wander in isolation of one another. The speed of the shift of the ‘south’ magnet up in the Arctic circle has quadrupled in the last decade when compared to the last century. I trace the source of the magnetic field(s) that emerge on the surface of Earth and I come with a different view than what most scientists are claiming on the true source of Earth magnetic field. More on https://planet-earth-2017.com/the-true-source-of-earth-magnetic-field/ and on https://planet-earth-2017.com/2014/06/23/current-magnetic-field-map-confirms-3-magnets-configuration/ . The Earth’s magnetic field serves to deflect most of the charged particles that arrive from the sun. The entrapped protons on the lower magnetic field cause the Thermosphere temperature to rise between 500 and 2,000 Celsius. The resultant thermal radiation in that region of the Atmosphere that lies between 100 to 800 km above sea level contributes to the energy that reaches the Troposphere and surface of Earth. The weakening of the magnetic field in the western and south western hemisphere by 14 to 29% in recent years, have resulted in rising temperature in the Thermosphere layer due to an increase in thermal radiation, which results from the collision between Thermosphere low density air molecules and the weaker magnetic field sped protons as well as protons themselves while spiraling around the magnetic field force lines. This translates into rising level of thermal radiation that reaches the surface of Earth; causing global warming. Nevertheless, the variation of the Thermosphere current temperature of 500 plus Celsius above the magnetic poles and 2,000 plus Celsius above the magnetic equator, results in Temperature Belts of homogenous climates on the surface of Earth to form in a circular bands around the magnetic poles in the northern and southern hemispheres. There is a cause and effect chain of events; the shift of the magnetic pole from Canada towards Siberia leads to the shift or the tilt magnetic field all along and therefore the tilting of the Temperature Belts causing southern USA to get into a warmer Temperature Belt while Siberia to get into a colder one. More on https://planet-earth-2017.com/heat-not-from-the-sun/ . The north magnetic pole in Antarctica has slightly moved in the last 100 years. Its strength has dropped by 4%. The opposite is observed in the northern hemisphere where the south magnetic pole has moved deeper into the Arctic Circle in the last 100 years. Its strength has dropped by 7% in the same period. This explains why the ice cap in east Antarctica is growing while it is melting the Arctic Circle as well as in west Antarctica where the north magnetic pole is moving away from. More on https://planet-earth-2017.com/2014/09/05/another-proof-that-low-surface-temperature-follows-the-magnetic-pole/ and https://planet-earth-2017.com/2014/08/15/the-true-drop-in-the-magnetic-field-strength/ . Be it a known or unknown planet such as the hypothetical “Tyche” for instance http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/news/wise20110218.html , the magnetic pull between the planets core magnets results in Earth’s dipole magnet to tilt since it is free to move inside the viscous Outer Core layer. The tie in of the magnetic field force lines generated out of various planets cause the source magnet to move and its pole to wander on the surface as is observed on Earth..

   I reflect on the information at http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24755-earths-poles-are-shifting-because-of-climate-change.html#.VBvPyf5xmM_ . I have not seen the model that would cause variation of surface loads to change the tilt of the axis of rotation versus the solar plateau. One has to consider that the radius of Earth is 6,000 km of material that range from 2.2 gm/cm3 to 13.1 gm/cm3. Water density is 1 gm/ cm3. Could the melting of a couple of thousands of meters of ice and reduction of ice load on Arctic and Antarctic areas cause the load to shift and axis of rotation to wobble and the axis angle to change? I explain on https://planet-earth-2017.com/what-makes-earth-spin/ , what makes the planet to spin and its spin speed to change leading the sea level and therefore coastal geography to change. Earth spin speed, according to my research, is a function of the angle that lies between the magnetic field and the axis of rotation at the perimeter that splits the Inner Mantle from the Outer Core. The less the angle the faster the spin speed and vice versa. If the magnetic pole moves to India for instance; not only a new ice cap will start forming there in India, but the spin speed will slow down. Currently, all objects on the geographic equator are moving at 1,670 km/ hour while objects at the geographic poles is not moving at all. Material at the geographic equator such as Crust and oceans try to escape into space due to its high speed and the gravitational pull of the planet is pulling it back. This results in a bulged planet. Now, if the spin speed slows down, such bulged oceans will start to subside at the geographic equator and elevate at the geographic poles. The melting and reduction of the ice caps may be offset by the rising ocean level in the far north and far south, keeping the impact of such fine load change to a minimum which would lead to no noticeable change in axis of rotation! More on sea level changes on https://planet-earth-2017.com/sea-level/ .

   Reply
3. katesisco says:

   April 12, 2017 at 1:09 pm

   Thank you for your book. I support your theory. I suggest that the Moon has finally found a scientific theory allows for huge vesicles: the slow impact theory has been replaced with a fast impact that allows for the vaporization of material. I would suggest that the plasma arc connecting Earth and the impactor (if there was one) actually created the vaporization and the resultant pure minerals that have baffled scientists like the extraordinary amount of mercury at the Moon’s south pole.

   Reply
4. M. C. says:

   July 9, 2017 at 4:44 pm

   I just discovered this website, but from what I’ve read so far, I’m very pleased with the diverse range of sources and topics that you used for your research! You wrote that the Mayan Calendar end date can be interpreted in more than one way, especially when cross-referenced with predictions by other ancient cultures, which I believed even before finding your website! Likewise, when Edgar Cayce spoke of the great earthquake in California occurring in ’36, people mistakenly thought he meant 1936 (instead of 2036) because they never cross-referenced that prediction with other reputable predictions, including another Cayce reading which said all major Earth changes have occurred in each respective age of Aquarius! Many sources I have found seem to place the climax of earth changes between the years 2036-2038, with those years being the end of a 40-year period of purification/ tribulation! Would also like to recommend the book entitled “Pole Shift” by John White, which is a great collection (and scientific analysis) of the world’s best “psychic” information (from people like Edgar Cayce, Nostradamus, Paul Solomon, and others) regarding the next pole shift. Surprisingly, that author concludes that a pole shift is highly unlikely, even though the information he analyzes suggests otherwise. Sometimes I find sources containing great research but bad/biased conclusions. There’s much more I could tell you but this is enough for now, unless you request more.

   Reply
   • T.Niazi says:

     July 10, 2017 at 4:34 am

     Thank you for the advice. I shall be glad to go through what John White wrote. I have noticed that there is a great confusion over the term “Pole Shift”. Most people, many scholars, and even some scientists refer to geo poles when they speak of pole shifting. In my research I look closer into the 2 magnetic poles. Wandering a couple of miles per annum may not merit the tilt of shifting poles. But, what if in one week the 2 magnetic poles relocate thousands of miles away from current locations? That could very well earn them the “Pole Shit” title, which rhymes well with the “psyche” information (as in magnetic poles shifting), but also supports what John White concluded (as in geo poles remain un-shifted). There are whole sections in my book “More Than 60 Minutes- When Earth Stands Still” that I did not carry to this website. Especially, that deals with quantum physics; trying to explain the science behind “psyche” information.

     Jerry Blevins, PhD, Aeronautical / Civil Engineer read my book and wrote on amazon.com that it is a pity that scientists are not looking at the model I proposed for the magnetic poles’ location influencing the location of Temperature Belts of homogeneous climates https://planet-earth-2017.com/heat-not-from-the-sun/ . And, that the ongoing movement of the 2 magnetic poles towards the east, which has started back in 1850 and has accelerated in recent year would result in “climate exchange”, where deserts became lush green terrains and vice versa.

     What is also attributed to the location of the magnetic poles, I found out, is the direction and the speed of the planet spin. I had to go through basic physics to find out the magnetic configuration https://planet-earth-2017.com/the-true-source-of-earth-magnetic-field/ at the core of our planet and how basic fundamentals of electricity; namely Lorentz Force is found out to be the driving force that makes Earth spin https://planet-earth-2017.com/what-makes-earth-spin/ . Geological records such as Antarctic plasmoids emerging some 10,000 years ago and ancient text speaking different number of days per solar year, provided necessary evidence to understand the cycle of change.

     There is no limit to pulling pieces together. I had to stop somewhere, and I came to conclude that 2017 is a year of cycle change. When I had my book published in 2009, I did recommend some strategies to get prepared in anchor industries such as Agriculture, Energy, Infrastructure, Food, ..etc. Your conviction of 2036 as a date of change is a better one, for it would allow humanity ample time to get prepared and mitigate the key areas of danger.

     Recent posts on the website does not appear in my book. I add them as and when a scientific or geological discovery comes along that proved any component of the model.

     Reply
5. Jim says:

   April 19, 2019 at 5:50 am

   Have you evaluated the information at http://www.dieholdfoundation.com/

   Reply